Article Data

  • Views 582
  • Dowloads 64

Original Research

Open Access

The associations of the diagnostic criterion pain modified by function with functional limitation and behavioral frequency

  • Rayan Alsuwailem1,2,*,
  • Heidi Crow3
  • Yoly Gonzalez3
  • Willard D. McCall3
  • Richard Ohrbach3

1Orofacial Pain Program, Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA

2Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Jouf University, 72388 Sakakah, Al Jawf, Saudi Arabia

3Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA

DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2024.026 Vol.38,Issue 3,September 2024 pp.46-57

Submitted: 05 February 2023 Accepted: 11 March 2024

Published: 12 September 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Rayan Alsuwailem E-mail: rayanals@buffalo.edu

Abstract

The aim is to assess the associations of jaw functional limitation and jaw overuse behavior with pain modified by function as a required diagnostic criterion for painful temporomandibular disorders. This cross-sectional study from the TMJ Impact Project utilized secondary data analyses of 249 participants who met the inclusion criteria of having facial pain in the prior 30 days and valid responses to the pain modified by function (Items 4A–D derived from the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Symptom Questionnaire). Independent t-tests (alpha = 0.05) were used to assess the associations between pain modified by function items with similarly assessed concepts from the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS) and Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC). The magnitude of each association was converted to an effect size for interpretation. Pain modified by mastication (item A) and jaw mobility (item B) were significantly associated with the corresponding JFLS items (effect sizes <0.1–1.0) and exhibited a hierarchical pattern. Pain modified by jaw overuse behaviors (item C) was associated with the corresponding OBC items (effect sizes <0.1–0.8). Pain modified by other functions (item D) exhibited associations with the corresponding JFLS items (effect sizes 0.5–0.9). Pain modified by function is an integral part of musculoskeletal disorders and anchored to the interoceptive body experience. Results indicate that the DC/TMD pain modified by function questions used as diagnostic criteria have sufficient scope and the responses fit with data measuring related constructs pertaining to etiology (OBC) or consequences (JFLS).


Keywords

Pain; Function; Movement; Limitation; Behaviors


Cite and Share

Rayan Alsuwailem,Heidi Crow,Yoly Gonzalez,Willard D. McCall,Richard Ohrbach. The associations of the diagnostic criterion pain modified by function with functional limitation and behavioral frequency. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2024. 38(3);46-57.

References

[1] Pereira PM, Amaro J, Ribeiro BT, Gomes A, De Oliveira P, Duarte J, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders’ classification proposal for application in occupational medicine. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 8223.

[2] Siegfried Mense. Muscle pain: understanding its nature, diagnosis, and treatment. 1st edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2001.

[3] Farlex Partner Medical Dictionary. 2012. Available at: https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/function (Accessed: 18 July 2024).

[4] Sogaard K, Sjogaard G. Physical activity as cause and cure of muscular pain: evidence of underlying mechanisms. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2017; 45: 136–145.

[5] Ayloo A, Cvengros T, Marella S. Evaluation and treatment of musculoskeletal chest pain. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice. 2013; 40: 863–887.

[6] Greene CS. Critical commentary 2: validity of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders axis i in clinical and research settings. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2009; 23: 20–23.

[7] Merskey H, Bogduk. N. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. 2nd edn. IASP: Seattle. 1995.

[8] Van Der Molen HF, Visser S, Alfonso JH, Curti S, Mattioli S, Rempel D, et al. Diagnostic criteria for musculoskeletal disorders for use in occupational healthcare or research: a scoping review of consensus—and synthesised-based case definitions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 169.

[9] Dos Santos Mota PH, Leite Gaudereto B, Alves Cardoso MR, Basso Schmitt AC. Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and impact on physical function and health care services in Belterra/PA. Physical Therapy in Movement. 2016; 29: 103–112.

[10] Ranelli S, Straker L, Smith A. Soreness during non-music activities is associated with playing-related musculoskeletal problems: an observational study of 731 child and adolescent instrumentalists. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2014; 60: 102–108.

[11] Pereira DS, Castro SS, Bertoncello D, Damiao R, Walsh IA. Relationship of musculoskeletal pain with physical and functional variables and with postural changes in school children from 6 to 12 years of age. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2013; 17: 392–400.

[12] Casazza BA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute low back pain. American Family Physician. 2012; 85: 343–350.

[13] Abreu-Ramos AM, Micheo WF. Lifetime prevalence of upper-body musculoskeletal problems in a professional-level symphony orchestra: age, gender, and instrument-specific results. Medical Problems of Performing Artists. 2007; 22: 97–104.

[14] Van Eerd D, Beaton D, Cole D, Lucas J, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Classification systems for upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders in workers: a review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2003; 56: 925–936.

[15] Teo PL, Bennell KL, Lawford B, Egerton T, Dziedzic K, Hinman RS. Patient experiences with physiotherapy for knee osteoarthritis in Australia-a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2021; 11: e043689.

[16] Overton M, Swain N, Falling C, Gwynne-Jones D, Fillingim R, Mani R. Activity-related pain predicts pain and functional outcomes in people with knee osteoarthritis: a longitudinal study. Frontiers in Pain Research. 2022; 3: 1082252.

[17] Leemans L, Nijs J, Antonis L, Wideman TH, Bandt HD, Franklin Z, et al. Do psychological factors relate to movement-evoked pain in people with musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2022; 26: 100453.

[18] Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet J-P, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network and orofacial pain special interest group. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2014; 28: 6–27.

[19] Klasser GD, Romero Reyes M. Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management. 7th edn. Quintessence Publishing Company: Batavia. 2023.

[20] Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders, symptom questionnaire. 2013. Available at: https://ubwp.buffalo.edu/rdc-tmdinternational/wp-content/uploads/sites/58/2017/01/DC-TMD_SQ_shortform_2013-05-12.pdf (Accessed: 18 July 2024).

[21] Ohrbach R, Gonzalez Y, List T, Michelotti A, Schiffman E. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Clinical Examination Protocol. 2013. Available at: https://ubwp.buffalo.edu/rdc-tmdinternational/wp-content/uploads/sites/58/2017/01/DC-TMD-Protocol-2013_06_02.pdf (Accessed: 18 July 2024).

[22] Ohrbach R, Larsson P, List T. The jaw functional limitation scale: development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2008; 22: 219–230.

[23] Ohrbach R, Granger C, List T, Dworkin S. Preliminary development and validation of the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2008; 36: 228–236.

[24] Ohrbach R, Markiewicz MR, McCall WD, Jr. Waking-state oral parafunctional behaviors: specificity and validity as assessed by electromyography. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2008; 116: 438–444.

[25] Markiewicz MR, Ohrbach R, McCall WD, Jr. Oral behaviors checklist: reliability of performance in targeted waking-state behaviors. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2006; 20: 306–316.

[26] Ohrbach R, Bair E, Fillingim RB, Gonzalez Y, Gordon SM, Lim PF, et al. Clinical orofacial characteristics associated with risk of first-onset TMD: the OPPERA prospective cohort study. The Journal of Pain. 2013; 14: T33–T50.

[27] Ohrbach R, Turner JA, Sherman JJ, Mancl LA, Truelove EL, Schiffman EL, et al. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. IV: evaluation of psychometric properties of the Axis II measures. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2010; 24: 48–62.

[28] Ohrbach R. Assessment and further development of RDC/TMD Axis II biobehavioural instruments: a research programme progress report. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2010; 37: 784–798.

[29] Schiffman EL, Truelove EL, Ohrbach R, Anderson GC, John MT, List T, et al. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. I: overview and methodology for assessment of validity. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2010; 24: 7–24.

[30] Look JO, John MT, Tai F, Huggins KH, Lenton PA, Truelove EL, et al. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. II: reliability of Axis I diagnoses and selected clinical measures. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2010; 24: 25–34.

[31] Schiffman EL, Ohrbach R, Truelove EL, Tai F, Anderson GC, Pan W, et al. The research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2010; 24: 63–78.

[32] Kaplan SE, Ohrbach R. Self-report of waking-state oral parafunctional behaviors in the natural environment. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2016; 30: 107–119.

[33] Cohen ME. Analysis of ordinal dental data: evaluation of conflicting recommendations. Journal of Dental Research. 2001; 80: 309–313.

[34] Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ. 1988.

[35] Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992; 112: 155–159.

[36] Vincent K, Tracey I. Hormones and their interaction with the pain experience. Reviews in Pain. 2008; 2: 20–24.

[37] Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013; 111: 52–58.

[38] Craig AD. A new view of pain as a homeostatic emotion. Trends in Neurosciences. 2003; 26: 303–307.

[39] Craig AD. Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2003; 13: 500–505.

[40] Craig AD. Pain mechanisms: labeled lines versus convergence in central processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2003; 26: 1–30.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top